Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Apple App Android App Blog
Pennsylvania Office:

ph: 610-667-7511
fax: 610-667-3440
555 City Line Avenue
Suite 500
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
map to office >>

Philadelphia Office:

ph: 215-238-1130
fax: 215-238-1132
1800 JFK Boulevard, Suite 300
Philadelphia, PA 19103
map to office >>

New Jersey Office:

ph: 856-667-7515
fax: 856-667-8666
385 Kings Highway North
Suite 210
Cherry Hill, NJ 08034
map to office >>

New York Office:

ph: 800-690-9315
11 Broadway
Suite 615
New York, NY 10004
map to office >>

Upstate New York Office:

ph: 800-690-9315
397 route 281
P.O. Box 430
Tully, NY 13159-0430
map to office

Nevada Gross Negligence Cap May Be Lifted

Posted on April 29th, 2009 No Comments

Legislation passed the Nevada State Assembly that would lift the damages cap on medical malpractice suits in cases where the jury finds the doctor guilty of gross negligence. The current cap of $350,000 refers to the compensation a victim receives for pain, suffering and other non-monetary losses. The cap was enacted in 2001 in response to calls for tort reform across the state.

The bill, which is now on it’s way to the Senate, would remove the damages cap in cases where the jury finds a conscious indifference to the consequences of the actions or an indifference to the safety and welfare of a patient.

Supporters of tort reform argue that the caps on non-economic damages help control insurance premiums and prevent doctors from leaving the state, while supporters of the new bill say it will encourage doctors to maintain high standards of care.

If you have been the victim of medical malpractice, please contact the Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyers of Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C. at 215-329-3511.


Colorado Medical Malpractice Bill Dies on House Floor

Posted on April 29th, 2009 No Comments

Colorado lawmakers killed a bill Wednesday that targeted medical-malpractice insurance companies, ending an effort to change the rules on medical malpractice in Colorado, pitting doctors against trial lawyers.

House Bill 1344, sponsored by Rep. Christine Scanlon, D-Dillon, would have made medical malpractice insurers get approval from Colorado’s insurance commissioner before they could raise premiums by more than 5 percent a year. 

While approved in the House of Representatives on Tuesday, lawmakers rejected the bill, 29-36, in the final reading.  HB 1344 originally would have raised the limits on how much money courts could award people who were injured by negligent doctors. Scanlon removed these lawsuit-limit provisions from the bill in a move to get more votes. 

If you have been the victim of medical malpractice, please contact the Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyers of Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C. at 215-329-3511.

 

Jury Awards $2.1M in Medical Malpractice Case

Posted on April 29th, 2009 No Comments

A jury has awarded $2.1 million to a Illinois man in a medical malpractice case he brought after injuries suffered during treatment he received after a motorcycle accident almost nine years ago. 

After a three week long trial, a Milwaukee County jury found Lorraine. C Novich-Welter negligent in the medical care she provided Daniel R. Nelson, 49. The jury awarded Nelson $994,716 in medical and health care expenses, $1 million for past and future pain, suffering and disability, $50,000 to Nelson’s wife for loss of consortium. The jury also awarded Nelson’s son Miles, who was fifteen months old at the time of the accident, $65,000 for lack of society and companionship.

Mary Lee Ratzel, attorney for Novich-Welter, said she was reviewing the options regarding the judgment. “We strongly believe that she excercised the highest standard of care. We do not believe she did anything wrong.” Ratzel said. 

According to J. Michael End, Nelson’s lawyer, Novich-Welter waited too long before calling a “code 4” (request for an emergency team) to clear a blockage in Nelson’s tracheotomy tube. “He nearly died and was in a virtual coma for seven weeks,” End said. “The hospital listed him as being in a persistent vegetative state and gave him a 0 percent chance of a meaningful recovery.”

The jury did not find Froedtert Hospital, where Nelson was treated, to be negligent.

If you have been the victim of medial malpractice please contact the Philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys of Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C. at 215-329-3511.

Substandard Medicine Going Undisciplined

Posted on April 24th, 2009 No Comments

The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen reported thatmany states are not disciplining doctors who practice substandard medicine. Thegroup previously reported that just 5 percent of American doctors areresponsible for half of the malpractice in the United States. To protectpatients state medical boards are to periodically review complaints andinvestigate deleterious outcomes. The report suggests this may not behappening.

The rate of discipline was 2.92, down from 3.72 in 2004.This means that 770 doctors avoided disciplinary action that would have beenaddressed in 2004. Serious discipline is defined as a suspension or revocationof a medical license, surrendering a medical license and probation orrestriction of a license.

Minnesota and Wisconsin ranked lowest for disciplinaryaction, with Minnesota taking 0.95 actions per 1000 physicians. The state withthe most discipline was Alaska with 6.54 serious actions per 1000 doctors.

If you or someone you know has been the victim of medicalmalpractice, please contact the Philadelphia medical malpractice attorneys ofLowenthal & Abrmas, P.C. at 215-329-3511.

California Woman Sues Doctor for Removing Wrong Ovary

Posted on April 15th, 2009 2 Comments

A California woman is suing her San Rafael gynecologist because the doctor allegedly removed the wrong ovary during an operation. 45-year-old Susan Swezy filed the case in Marion Superior Court naming her doctor and her employer, Kaiser Permanente San Rafael Medical Center, as defendants. Swezy says her doctor ordered a pelvic ultrasound test in November of 2007. The test revealed a cystic mass on her right ovary.

The doctor, Swezy says, then recommended removing the entire ovary and Fallopian tube because of the risk of cancer. During surgery the doctor removed her left ovary. The suit alleges that upon realizing her mistake, the doctor wrote a postoperative report noting a 3-4 centimeter cyst on the left ovary. Subsequent testing revealed no such cyst. Swezy's lawyer says "[the] defendant… intentionally fabricated her findings of a 3-4 cm cyst for the purposes of (1) justifying the removal of the wrong left ovary, and (2) to cover up her error removing the left ovary instead of the right one."

 

If you suspect you have been the victim of medical malpractice please contact the Philidelphia medical malpractice lawyers of Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C. at 215-329-3511.

Oregon Raises Malpractice Cap

Posted on April 8th, 2009 1 Comment

The house voted monday 50-8 in favor of a bill which dramatically increases the amount the Oregon government can pay in cases of medical malpractice. The cap on state run agencies now ranges from $1.5 million to $3 million. The damages limit for local agencies starts at $500,000 per claim and $1 million per incident. After five years the numbers will be indexed for inflation. The state cap was $200,000. Rep. Jeff Barker, D-Aloha, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, calls the bill "a step in the right direction."

The bill passed two days before lawyers in Colorado introduced a similar bill to the state's legislative session. Currently plaintiffs in Colorado can recieve $300,000 for non economic damages but all malpractice damages are capped at $1 million. The new bill calls for the cap to be raised every year with inflation.

If you have been the victim of medical malpractice, find out what your options are. Talk with an experienced Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyer of Lowenthal & Abrams, P.C., at 215-329-3511.  

home  |  firm profile  |  practice areas  |  articles  |  faqs  |  blog  |  contact us  | sitemap | Log in

©2007-2009 Lowenthal and Abrams, P.C. All rights reserved

Philadelphia, PA. | Manhattan, NY. | Newark, NJ. The hiring of a attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a attorney/client relationship. Copyright .